It feels good to be back in Las Vegas. I recently tried watching CSI: Miami, and even though it’s a good series, I couldn’t quite get through the first season. I think it was too stylish for me, with too much weird color grading and sometimes too much “look how stylish we are in Miami.”
Now we’re dealing with the night shift in Las Vegas, and just the neon lights and darkness at night give us a completely different vibe, even though most of the filming took place in and around Los Angeles.
We’re currently on episode 16 of season 1, “Too Tough to Die.” The characters have moved past their initial uncertainties and are settled. We’ve also seen recurring characters like Bobby (weapons specialist), Mindy (fingerprint expert), and Terry (bone specialist) several times already.
While watching, I noticed my brain often tried to draw parallels to Dr. House, but it’s not that simple. Sure, there are definitely similarities, as difficult cases need to be solved by a team of specialists in their field. But the approach is entirely different because we’re in forensics, not medicine.
What I like the most, which is often handled through allegorical storytelling in Dr. House, are the different philosophical approaches Grissom explores in a quiet moment. I mean the quotes he often inserts. I especially liked his explanation at the end of “Unfriendly Skies” when the team sits together discussing how they would have acted. No one even thought about the victim and just went along with what the witnesses/perpetrators said. It’s something I always try to keep in mind—that when confronted with an absolute situation, it’s rarely, if ever, actually absolute, and there’s always another perspective. I think it’s a very important message!
But of course, CSI: Las Vegas also offers the messages that a Dr. House series does, just, as mentioned, not quite as allegorical but on a much more direct path. It’s not always focused on Las Vegas either; it can be applied generally, especially when it comes to theft or dealing with other people. Sometimes you might think that the murders are just used to convey these messages, and what happens around them contains the actual message.
Unfortunately, Catherine is still a bit exhausting, and I also don’t really like the whole storyline with her husband or ex-husband. It’s just not my thing! Sure, she’s supposed to represent the strong, mature woman who made it out of the casino world in Las Vegas, and she does that pretty well, no question. But the attitude she displays toward Sara or Warrick in this case is just not okay.
Fortunately, the hostility between the police and CSI has also been set aside again. It’s happening more and more often that the team addresses the officer or detective at the crime scene by name and sometimes even chat a bit. I find that very pleasant, and it gives you the feeling that you’re watching a very large and well-coordinated team.
The truly tragic figure in all of this, even though you might not know it yet, is among all the Warrick and Grissom drama. Warrick because he also made it from the bottom to the top as a CSI and can continually assert himself with his insider knowledge of Las Vegas. He’s an important part of the team. But his fate is already sealed, even though it will take about six more seasons.
Grissom, on the other hand, because his mind can increasingly understand or comprehend less and less of what’s happening around him. He feels less and less at home in this world or can understand why people are capable of all these acts, even though he loves the world itself and everything that keeps it moving (humans are not really needed for this; the world does fine without them!).
Leave a Reply